knowledge -WSS

knowledge

author：leisure time 2025-10-04 03:59:53 - browse：55764

A crowd of miniature figurines facing towards an hourglass. -- cancer coverage from STAT — Adobe

It’s no secret that a lucky few seem to glide into old age, the years settling gracefully on their bodies, while others appear to have been dragged through time tied to a metaphorical garbage truck. Biologists have been developing numerous ways to measure the rate an individual ages — often called an accelerated or decelerated “biological age” — and trying to translate it into a heightened or reduced risk of the morbidity and mortality that comes with aging.

There’s been a proliferation of various biological aging clocks, mathematical models that look at things like genetic markers or proteins in your body to make some estimation of an individual’s biological age. Research interest in using these clocks has exploded. In the last five years, thousands of papers on or incorporating the clocks have been published. The paper describing one popular biological aging clock, PhenoAge, has over 1,800 citations alone. One recent study suggested that a reason cancer incidence is increasing among younger adults may be accelerated aging, based on this particular clock.

But as scientists use these clocks to associate biological age with specific health risks, like cancer or dementia, and numerous companies eagerly offer biological age measurements in exchange for hundreds of bucks, it may be worth noting that experts don’t agree on what “biological age” actually is.

STAT+ Exclusive Story

Already have an account? Log in

This article is exclusive to STAT+ subscribers

Unlock this article — plus in-depth analysis, newsletters, premium events, and networking platform access.

Already have an account? Log in

Monthly

$39

Totals $468 per year

$39/month Get Started

Totals $468 per year

Starter

$30

for 3 months, then $39/month

$30 for 3 months Get Started

Then $39/month

Annual

$399

Save 15%

$399/year Get Started

Save 15%

11+ Users

Custom

Savings start at 25%!

Request A Quote Request A Quote

Savings start at 25%!

2-10 Users

$300

Annually per user

$300/year Get Started

$300 Annually per user

View All Plans

Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

Subscribe Log In

Previous article： Medical leaders decry Supreme Court decision on affirmative action
Next article： Covid vaccines: Private market messier than government rollout

Wikipedia

hotspot

WSS

FDA seeks to regulate lab

How a symptom of dementia informs our understanding of creativity

FDA advisers vote against ALS treatment from BrainStorm

Covid vaccines: Private market messier than government rollout

Did you have Obamacare on your GOP debate bingo card?

Listen: Who gets the credit for GLP

hotspot

knowledge

This article is exclusive to STAT+ subscribers

Unlock this article — plus in-depth analysis, newsletters, premium events, and networking platform access.

leisure time

Jerome Adams on the need for new antivirals for Covid

Departing Stanford president retracts two papers

ChatGPT in medicine: STAT answers readers' burning questions

In science, is the line between industry and academia shifting?

In Memoriam: Notable people who died in 2023

Complete sequence of Y chromosome published for first time

DIEP, the 'gold standard' of breast reconstruction, is under threat

Researchers use wearables data and AI to predict preterm birth risk

Activists slam private health insurers over coverage restrictions

Complete sequence of Y chromosome published for first time

hotspot

Menendez indictment could see pharma lose a key ally

Listen: Who gets the credit for GLP

Shingles, which affected Dianne Feinstein, is on the rise

Researchers use wearables data and AI to predict preterm birth risk

Did you have Obamacare on your GOP debate bingo card?

Listen: Who gets the credit for GLP

entertainment

Wikipedia

hotspot

Wikipedia