<code id='F306275890'></code><style id='F306275890'></style>
    • <acronym id='F306275890'></acronym>
      <center id='F306275890'><center id='F306275890'><tfoot id='F306275890'></tfoot></center><abbr id='F306275890'><dir id='F306275890'><tfoot id='F306275890'></tfoot><noframes id='F306275890'>

    • <optgroup id='F306275890'><strike id='F306275890'><sup id='F306275890'></sup></strike><code id='F306275890'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='F306275890'><label id='F306275890'><select id='F306275890'><dt id='F306275890'><span id='F306275890'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='F306275890'></u>
          <i id='F306275890'><strike id='F306275890'><tt id='F306275890'><pre id='F306275890'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          00:00
          00:00 00:00 LIVE
          buffering
          Replay
          LIVE
          00:00 / 00:00
          LIVE
          CC
          Opacity :
          Share:
          Close

          leisure time

          author:hotspot    - browse:727
          Adam's take main illustration
          Molly Ferguson/STAT

          The approval Friday of Bluebird Bio’s gene therapy for sickle cell disease should have been a momentum-swinging achievement for the long-struggling biotech. Instead, the company mispriced its new drug and fumbled a pivotal financial lifeline.

          The consequences of these strategic blunders — arguably, self-inflicted — could imperil Bluebird’s independence, perhaps even its survival.

          advertisement

          Bluebird priced Lyfgenia at $3.1 million, while Vertex Pharmaceutical set the cost of Casgevy, its competing sickle cell treatment also approved on Friday, at $2.2 million. Not only is Lyfgenia significantly more expensive, but its prescribing label carries a “black box” safety warning, which requires patients undergo regular blood monitoring for cancer risk. Casgevy has no similar monitoring requirement.

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In

          knowledge