<code id='689E638594'></code><style id='689E638594'></style>
    • <acronym id='689E638594'></acronym>
      <center id='689E638594'><center id='689E638594'><tfoot id='689E638594'></tfoot></center><abbr id='689E638594'><dir id='689E638594'><tfoot id='689E638594'></tfoot><noframes id='689E638594'>

    • <optgroup id='689E638594'><strike id='689E638594'><sup id='689E638594'></sup></strike><code id='689E638594'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='689E638594'><label id='689E638594'><select id='689E638594'><dt id='689E638594'><span id='689E638594'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='689E638594'></u>
          <i id='689E638594'><strike id='689E638594'><tt id='689E638594'><pre id='689E638594'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          00:00
          00:00 00:00 LIVE
          buffering
          Replay
          LIVE
          00:00 / 00:00
          LIVE
          CC
          Opacity :
          Share:
          Close

          focus

          author:explore    - browse:639
          Influenza A virions
          F. A. Murphy/CDC

          Vir Biotechnology said Thursday that a long-acting antibody drug designed to protect healthy individuals from influenza A failed to do so in a nearly 3,000-person clinical trial.

          Volunteers who received the highest dose of the drug, known as VIR-2482, were only 16% less likely than the placebo group to develop symptomatic influenza A infections, as defined by trial criteria, over a seven-month period. The difference was not statistically significant.

          advertisement

          The results are a setback in broader efforts to develop better protective measures against both seasonal and potential pandemic influenza strains. In the short term, Vir and outside experts hoped VIR-2482 could provide additional annual protection for at-risk groups like older adults, as flu vaccines are often only modestly effective.

          Unlock this article by subscribing to STAT+ and enjoy your first 30 days free!

          GET STARTED Log In

          leisure time