<code id='9BFB032406'></code><style id='9BFB032406'></style>
    • <acronym id='9BFB032406'></acronym>
      <center id='9BFB032406'><center id='9BFB032406'><tfoot id='9BFB032406'></tfoot></center><abbr id='9BFB032406'><dir id='9BFB032406'><tfoot id='9BFB032406'></tfoot><noframes id='9BFB032406'>

    • <optgroup id='9BFB032406'><strike id='9BFB032406'><sup id='9BFB032406'></sup></strike><code id='9BFB032406'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='9BFB032406'><label id='9BFB032406'><select id='9BFB032406'><dt id='9BFB032406'><span id='9BFB032406'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='9BFB032406'></u>
          <i id='9BFB032406'><strike id='9BFB032406'><tt id='9BFB032406'><pre id='9BFB032406'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          00:00
          00:00 00:00 LIVE
          buffering
          Replay
          LIVE
          00:00 / 00:00
          LIVE
          CC
          Opacity :
          Share:
          Close

          focus

          author:entertainment    - browse:77
          Peter Marks. -- health coverage from STAT
          Peter Marks, Director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research at the Food and Drug Administration. Susan Walsh-Pool/Getty Images

          Peter Marks wants drug developers to ask more stupid questions.

          It’s part of the top Food and Drug Administration official’s plan to reinvigorate gene therapy, a field that has struggled despite significant technological advances. Some companies are shelving programs or going out of business, even when they have promising data. 

          advertisement

          The problems are numerous: The diseases are often exceptionally rare, limiting the potential market. Manufacturing at commercial quality is complex and expensive. Proving a drug works can be difficult, because there may be too few patients to run a traditional randomized study. 

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In

          explore