<code id='852E589622'></code><style id='852E589622'></style>
    • <acronym id='852E589622'></acronym>
      <center id='852E589622'><center id='852E589622'><tfoot id='852E589622'></tfoot></center><abbr id='852E589622'><dir id='852E589622'><tfoot id='852E589622'></tfoot><noframes id='852E589622'>

    • <optgroup id='852E589622'><strike id='852E589622'><sup id='852E589622'></sup></strike><code id='852E589622'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='852E589622'><label id='852E589622'><select id='852E589622'><dt id='852E589622'><span id='852E589622'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='852E589622'></u>
          <i id='852E589622'><strike id='852E589622'><tt id='852E589622'><pre id='852E589622'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          00:00
          00:00 00:00 LIVE
          buffering
          Replay
          LIVE
          00:00 / 00:00
          LIVE
          CC
          Opacity :
          Share:
          Close

          knowledge

          author:explore    - browse:2
          Influenza A virions
          F. A. Murphy/CDC

          Vir Biotechnology said Thursday that a long-acting antibody drug designed to protect healthy individuals from influenza A failed to do so in a nearly 3,000-person clinical trial.

          Volunteers who received the highest dose of the drug, known as VIR-2482, were only 16% less likely than the placebo group to develop symptomatic influenza A infections, as defined by trial criteria, over a seven-month period. The difference was not statistically significant.

          advertisement

          The results are a setback in broader efforts to develop better protective measures against both seasonal and potential pandemic influenza strains. In the short term, Vir and outside experts hoped VIR-2482 could provide additional annual protection for at-risk groups like older adults, as flu vaccines are often only modestly effective.

          Unlock this article by subscribing to STAT+ and enjoy your first 30 days free!

          GET STARTED Log In

          leisure time