<code id='BBDE36DB16'></code><style id='BBDE36DB16'></style>
    • <acronym id='BBDE36DB16'></acronym>
      <center id='BBDE36DB16'><center id='BBDE36DB16'><tfoot id='BBDE36DB16'></tfoot></center><abbr id='BBDE36DB16'><dir id='BBDE36DB16'><tfoot id='BBDE36DB16'></tfoot><noframes id='BBDE36DB16'>

    • <optgroup id='BBDE36DB16'><strike id='BBDE36DB16'><sup id='BBDE36DB16'></sup></strike><code id='BBDE36DB16'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='BBDE36DB16'><label id='BBDE36DB16'><select id='BBDE36DB16'><dt id='BBDE36DB16'><span id='BBDE36DB16'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='BBDE36DB16'></u>
          <i id='BBDE36DB16'><strike id='BBDE36DB16'><tt id='BBDE36DB16'><pre id='BBDE36DB16'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          00:00
          00:00 00:00 LIVE
          buffering
          Replay
          LIVE
          00:00 / 00:00
          LIVE
          CC
          Opacity :
          Share:
          Close

          leisure time

          author:comprehensive    - browse:34476
          Two people stare at a keyhole in a human head in between them, as the short-haired person on the left holds a key — first opinion coverage from STAT
          Adobe

          In many ways, psychiatry is still flying blind. People experiencing mental health conditions are prescribed various drugs until one (or a combination) finally works — a painful process that can take years. As a psychiatrist and neuroscientist, I became increasingly impatient and frustrated with this ineffective way of treating patients. This guided the core question behind my research: Can biology explain how people with the same psychiatric disorder respond differently to the same treatment?

          Since I first began exploring this question more than a decade ago, mental illness has become a global epidemic. Despite significant efforts, progress in psychiatric drug development has remained disappointingly slow. There have been a few notable approvals in recent years, and a renewal of interest by Big Pharma, following a retreat from psychiatric research in the mid to late 2000s. But the landscape remains predominantly marked by failures and a dry drug development pipeline. Approved drugs follow the same pattern of prescribing via guesswork, with most patients not responding to a given drug. This cycle of trial-and-error drug development producing trial-and-error treatment arises from a simple source: We have not systematized a process for learning from our failures and successes.

          advertisement

          Related: A ‘renaissance in neuroscience’ could deliver a fresh crop of psychiatric medicines

          For example, take depression: While the rise of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in the 1980s and 1990s seemed to provide a solution, seminal studies in the 2000s exposed fundamental limitations of our treatment options. Antidepressants are widely prescribed, but their efficacy relative to placebo is modest.

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In

          explore