<code id='881756171C'></code><style id='881756171C'></style>
    • <acronym id='881756171C'></acronym>
      <center id='881756171C'><center id='881756171C'><tfoot id='881756171C'></tfoot></center><abbr id='881756171C'><dir id='881756171C'><tfoot id='881756171C'></tfoot><noframes id='881756171C'>

    • <optgroup id='881756171C'><strike id='881756171C'><sup id='881756171C'></sup></strike><code id='881756171C'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='881756171C'><label id='881756171C'><select id='881756171C'><dt id='881756171C'><span id='881756171C'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='881756171C'></u>
          <i id='881756171C'><strike id='881756171C'><tt id='881756171C'><pre id='881756171C'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          00:00
          00:00 00:00 LIVE
          buffering
          Replay
          LIVE
          00:00 / 00:00
          LIVE
          CC
          Opacity :
          Share:
          Close

          knowledge

          author:explore    - browse:8694
          Influenza A virions
          F. A. Murphy/CDC

          Vir Biotechnology said Thursday that a long-acting antibody drug designed to protect healthy individuals from influenza A failed to do so in a nearly 3,000-person clinical trial.

          Volunteers who received the highest dose of the drug, known as VIR-2482, were only 16% less likely than the placebo group to develop symptomatic influenza A infections, as defined by trial criteria, over a seven-month period. The difference was not statistically significant.

          advertisement

          The results are a setback in broader efforts to develop better protective measures against both seasonal and potential pandemic influenza strains. In the short term, Vir and outside experts hoped VIR-2482 could provide additional annual protection for at-risk groups like older adults, as flu vaccines are often only modestly effective.

          Unlock this article by subscribing to STAT+ and enjoy your first 30 days free!

          GET STARTED Log In

          focus